Glassheim: The People Would Vote For The Alerus Center Again

Written by Kate Bommarito. Posted in News, Plains Daily Exclusives

Tagged: , , , ,

Published on July 26, 2011 with 2 Comments">2 Comments

GRAND FORKS, ND – Grand Forks’ finance committee met last night and is requesting a $250,000 advance to the Alerus Center should the Center need to draw on the funds to pay its bills.

In an interview this afternoon on the Scott Hennen show, Grand Forks City Council member and ND State Representative Eliot Glassheim admitted that the move “is a risk,” loaning more money to the entity which has not yet been able to repay past loans, but he contends that the risk is outweighed by other benefits the center brings to the city.

“I think those who never wanted it in the first place don’t think about what the Alerus Center has meant to the city,” said Glassheim. “I think over the last eight or nine years they have averaged about $135,000 in losses. But the amount of people they bring in, the sales tax revenue they bring in, their employees buying houses, the money spent by people who stay there, a $50 million hotel that was built only because of it,” all of those things – according to Glassheim – more than offset the direct costs to the city.

“The city is on the hook for $100-200,000 each year,” said Glassheim. “The people of Grand Forks voted for it a least twice, and there it is. It exists. But the people voted for it. They had a choice to tax themselves or not, and they voted to tax themselves in order to get this thing.”

Although the Arena part is losing money, the Convention Center is making money Glassheim noted, reminding listeners that there were at least some profitable aspects of the project.

Share this Article

  • Lynn Bergman

    The Alerus Center idea originally arose out of envy (of the Fargodome) as so many actiions of government have in the last 20 years. It’s as if elected representatives are in race to see who can most extravagantly spend taxpayer dollars.

    Other examples: The Grand Forks county jail, the new hockey arena in Fargo, the Olympic style swimming venue in Bismarck, the doubling of the size of the heritage center, the purchase by the city of a shopping mall in Bismarck, the purchase of a water park in Mandan. The list goes on and on. THAT is why Measure 2 is on the ballot next June to eliminate property taxes in North Dakota. 

    Opponents of that measure say it removes “local control”, but where to we see any restraint, any fiscal discipline, any responsibility to the taxpayers expressed these days by local government officials? If an allowance burns a hole in the pocket of a teenager, its time to take it away; the same must be done with politicians who do not understand the difference between “taxes” and “tithes”, between “government” and “society”. The role of government was never intended by the founders to enter the arena of “philanthropy” or to “compete with free market enterprises”.

    Let envy, greed and other negative human traits drive the free markets where they have a place in keeping down prices…but we must restrict the employment of such vices by governments.

  • greenglass4

    Glassheim is totally off the mark ! The first vote was no ! Then they changed the price and wording on the ballot to confuse the voters (remember the Library Vote) and hired paid lobbyists at UND and bribed the students with free pizza and free beer in University Park , to vote for the Alerus! Ralph Englestad built a better building and Alerus or Aurora should have been scrapped ! Glassheim is for every project that takes your tax money! Remember he was on the Library Board to increase taxes by $21 million and demolish our current library and build a new building ! Glassheim as a crazy liberal/progressive Democrat never seen a new tax he didn’t like !!!! Think about it !