Rep. Rick Berg Says He Doesn’t Trust EPA On Fracking And Other Regulatory Issues

Written by Plains Daily Report. Posted in Plains Daily Exclusives

Tagged: , , , ,

Published on December 02, 2011 with 5 Comments">5 Comments

WASHINGTON, DC – “I believe these things should be regulated at the local level,” said Rep. Rick Berg of fears that the EPA will ban or inhibit hydraulic fracturing, a key technique used in oil and gas production in western in North Dakota. “As its shifted more to the federal level…I just think we have a lot of problems.”

Asked if he trusted the EPA’s assurances that they aren’t pursing a ban on fracking, Berg said “obviously not.”

“I’ve asked for [assurances from the EPA] in writing,” he said in an interview today. “We’ll see if we get that. There are some requirements that are going to be coming out next year that could have an impact on how we’re developing energy in North Dakota. I think we need to stay on top of that.”

Senator John Hoeven spoke with EPA administrators earlier this week and got assurances that a moratorium on fracking wasn’t being planned for.

He also pointed out that fracking isn’t the only area of regulatory concern with the EPA. “That’s a big problem with the Haze rule,” he said. “The state was going along with its own regulations and everything was just fine, and then the EPA decided to take it away.”

Berg pointed to legislation he’s co-sponsoring that he feels would protect states from unnecessary regulation. “We’re going to vote on the REINS Act next week,” he said noting that it would require that new regulatory rules be approved by a vote in Congress. “That bill would be the solution to a lot of the uncertainty that’s out there with our energy industry and the business sector.”

But Berg also said that the REINS Act isn’t the only solution for regulatory overreach. “The REINS Act would be a fix. It would be like we in North Dakota have an administrative rules committee,” he said. “Beyond that, what we need to do is we need to ensure that the states are going to regulate this and that it’s not going to be kicked up to the federal government.”

The Senate voted on the REINS Act last month, but it failed to pass.

Share this Article

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_45JV7RXBKGFJSDTDOEZHBETYFA Dakota Kid

    If a specific industrial process has no affect on neighboring states, such as the majority of fracking in both  North Dakota and Pennsylvania, then the federal government should have no voice.  That is both true under the 10th amendment and the commerce clause.  If the federal government has no jurisdiction and muscles its way in is not this tyranny?

    • bottineau bay

      You of course assume that the practice does not affect any other State. So if the State of North Dakota ruins an aquifer or creates air pollution that reaches another State, it’s not just a “North Dakota” issue. But on the larger point, fracking is not going to be eliminated, regardless of the environmental costs. Big money always trumps civic responsibility, and even my more leftist friends recognize that fracking is here to stay, whatever the cost.

      • Oilguy

        Its cheaper to import water than energy duh(smart ass comment)…..keep on fracing…..or do you want the economy to ruin lives for another 10 years.

        • Oilguy

          lets see your test results Mr. Bottineau bay scientist

  • Lynn Bergman

    The EPA will soon implement a “paperwork nightmare” that will have the affect of stalling oil development in North Dakota for months if not years…and Senator Hoeven’s saying the equivalent of “calm down and trust me, all is well.” That’s a “liberal” stance…as expected! He depends on Dems and RINOs to support him in every election… Will any investigative journalist / reporter ever ask why and delve into the reasons behind that fact?